.

Blog: More Work Remains to Prepare for the Next “Big One”

With over 75 million Americans vulnerable to earthquakes, Congress must ensure support for vital earthquake monitoring and response programs.

By Representative Adam Schiff

Almost 20 years ago, many across Southern California were jolted awake in the middle of the night by the Northridge earthquake. The earthquake and its aftershocks took the lives of almost 60 people, injured nearly another 9,000 residents and cost the region and homeowners over $20 billion.

Since that terrible day, there has been a concerted effort at the local, state and federal level to stress the importance of earthquake preparedness and detection technology. And with over 75 million Americans vulnerable to earthquakes, Congress must ensure support for vital earthquake monitoring and response programs.

Earlier this year, a 4.5 magnitude earthquake centered in East Orange County triggered Cal Tech’s earthquake warning system nearly 10 seconds before shaking was felt in Pasadena—the first time an earthquake in the U.S. was ever detected before the ground had begun to shake.

Despite these advancements, some in Congress have targeted the National Earthquake Hazards Reduction Program in a series of budget-cutting moves—which includes the early warning system still being developed by scientists in Southern California. Such a system would be enormously helpful in providing residents and first responders with advance notice that could help avert major infrastructure damage by shutting down mechanical systems like mass transit and elevators.

Instead of passing a budget this year, Congress had to settle for another “Continuing Resolution,” which keeps programs funded at the same level—no increases or decreases—as the previous fiscal year. For prototype’s like the U.S. Geological Survey’s “Shake Alert,” which was partially designed by the USGS in Pasadena, budget constraints have severely limited its implementation. Despite these roadblocks, I remain hopeful that Congress will be able to come together to pass a budget in the near future.

That is I have joined a bipartisan group of legislators in urging the Office of Management and Budget to maintain funding for the Earthquake Hazard Program and the Global Seismic Network.

While the need to address the national debt is real, accomplishing that task must be done in such a way that it does not jeopardize programs that protect lives and properly.

Every few months, we are reminded about Los Angeles’ vulnerability with tremors and small earthquakes rattling our homes and businesses. It is critical that the United States maintains its vigilance and expertise in earthquake preparedness, and I am hopeful that when the House and Senate meet to work out the appropriations bills, we will be able to secure funding for this vital program.

When you consider the lives that would be spared if we had some warning before the next “big one,” it is a small and very prudent investment.

Representative Adam Schiff serves in the U.S. House of Representatives.

This post is contributed by a community member. The views expressed in this blog are those of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of Patch Media Corporation. Everyone is welcome to submit a post to Patch. If you'd like to post a blog, go here to get started.

ROBERT E. FISHBACK November 30, 2012 at 02:44 PM
I have my doubts that one can prepare adequately for the big one or a big one. The best thing is get out of a risky building quick. These events can come on so quick that the time to get in the best place is only a matter of a few seconds. The idea sounds good and looks good on paper, The big one will pretty much destroy the infra-structure including roads, pipes carrying water, gas, and sewage. The last big one on the Southern section of the S.A. fault was in the 1800's...The Fort Tejon quake. Yes, the big one is overdue. If you could see the L.A. Basin after the big one, you would move tomorrow.
SIMON December 07, 2012 at 04:11 AM
What's going to happen to our neighborhood since we also lost a fire engine (station 20) that's a total of 12 firefighters from our community we lost. Fire chief Emile Mack wants to be our councilmember and replace Garcetti. As we all remember Garcetti permanently shut down our fire engine and since Fire Chief Mack has done nothing to bring it back, now Mack says he is concerned for our safety, or is Mack more concerned with a double pension. That leaves us more vulnerable therefore we need to prep rare

Boards

More »
Got a question? Something on your mind? Talk to your community, directly.
Note Article
Just a short thought to get the word out quickly about anything in your neighborhood.
Share something with your neighbors.What's on your mind?What's on your mind?Make an announcement, speak your mind, or sell somethingPost something